The problem is, it's not always black and white. What makes a knife "cheap" to one person may make it "inexpensive" to another. Beauty (and value) is in the eye of the beholder. Perfect example? The Browning Crowell/Barker Competition knife. Unsub says "cheap". Scott Gossman says "inexpensive". Who's right and who's wrong?
who's right and who's wrong depends on how the knife performs. cheap is an indictment of quality, inexpensive describes price.
i agree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder... how do you think i scored a wife <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
