I saw an earlier post where someone requested I chop together a SarSquatch with Res-C.


There are things I like about the SARSquatch, but I would rather not have a swedge like the SARSquatch has.

There are some subtle differences between the blade shapes of my Scrapweiler Concept and the SarSquatch's.
I really like the SarSquatch's blade - except for the swedge. But, in the end, I am pretty sure I prefer the Scrapweiler blade design over the SARSquatch's.... I like the slightly pointier tip and the curves.

I do LOVE Convex blades. But, I assume Dan isn't going to convex the blades.


Outside of that, most of the significant differentiating details of the SARSquatch are in the handle - which is a non-issue.

I don't know the exact size of the SARSquatch. I saw and saved a picture of the SARSquatch next to the Chopweiler. The knives are pretty small in the pic as there are many knives. But, I gather the Chopweiler might be about a 1/2" longer than the SARSquatch.

For the fun of it, I chopped my "Best Estimate" in scale in between the Green Chopweiler and Scrapweiler.


[Linked Image from i80.photobucket.com]



The angles from pictures make some differences. But, I get the impression the SAWSquatch might have a little taller blade.

Also, I think the SARSquatch was 0.185" thick. So, noticably thinner than the Chopweiler.

Again, I feel 0.22" would be a nice balance in thickness vs. light for carry and utility purposes. Just my opinion.


.


JYD #39 I prefer "SATIN" blades!!!