To avoid hi-jacking this thread and turning it into a political thread, I'll make this my last post.

MM - I think we are in agreement for the most part. Like everyone else, we just differ in what FREEDOM should mean and what it should allow. Obviously, religion and the constitution will come into play for many....As will morals, values and American pride. Social issues are tough to debate because there often isn't a right or wrong side.

I know that the comparison I made to running someone off the road wasn't realistic...It was just an over-the-top way to point out that freedoms, especially ones not laid out in the constitution, can be tricky and there has to be limits. What those limits are, I can't say. The balance between anarchy, rule of law, and freedoms is a tricky thing.

Thanks for the responses. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />