I took both blades out this morning for a quick chop-off. The weather here in Seattle has been unseasonably warm and it was just beautiful and spring-like out there today.
![[Linked Image from i789.photobucket.com]](http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy174/seattleduke/2blades1.jpg)
In the hand both knives feel really good. The BWM LE is not much heavier and the black paper handles are nicer to use than the canvas micarta but the Res C handles on the DF LE feel more comfortable and controllable. Res C trumps micarta for me anyday.
I did two simple tests – as straight chopping test (twice) with the same number of strokes per knife and then a lengthways wood split test.
![[Linked Image from i789.photobucket.com]](http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy174/seattleduke/2blades2.jpg)
The lower chop section is from the BWM LE and the upper from the DF LE.
In both cases the BWM LE edged out the DF LE. I would have expected so on the split test given the extra weight and the saber grind but I was a little surprised that the chopping difference was easily noticeable.
The BWM LE is factory sharp so that could account for some of the difference but I have to eat a little humble pie as my speculation about the relative performance was off.
![[Linked Image from i789.photobucket.com]](http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy174/seattleduke/2blades3.jpg)
Still, lighter and cheaper means that the DF LE will be my first choice in a pack but the BWM LE is no slouch. I would need to work the handles a little to make it sit in my hand more positively but both are really great blades.