Forgive my ignorance on blade grind geometry but wouldnt a full convex grind be best with this thickness? Would bring it closer to a hybrid machete/chopper? I would guess that would bring the cost way up on them though. Maybe if the coating ever gets to ugly it would be worth trying. All speculation of course. I kinda like the extra beef, dont need to worry about what I sink it into.
As far as I know the only way to put a full convexed grind on a knife is to do it by hand. Obviously this would take far more time and effort thus substantially raising the cost.
Interesting. Not to doubt your knowledge, but do you have any sources? You could be absolutely right, but it would be surprising to me.
Logically, if one blade geometry could only be accomplished by hand, it would mean that a blade with that geometry would cost a great deal more than a blade with a geometry that can be produced by machine. I own several Busses that have full convex grinds and they were not more expensive to comparable blades with a FFG or Sabre grind.
One example would be the NMSFNO and the SFNO. The former has a blade that is just over 8" and has a full height convex grind, the latter has roughly a 7" blade and is full flat ground. The SFNO was sold for $287 and the NMSFNO was $327. The difference of $40 can easily be attributed to the longer & thicker blade, the nuclear meltdown treatment, inflation, et. al.
Their are many other examples of full height convex ground Busses that are priced similarly to comparable blades designed with other grind geometries. To name a few: the original Team Gemini; SAR 4, 6, 8; SARSquatch; SARGE-7; NMFBM; SJTAC; et. al.
If what you say is true, I think Busse would charge far more for any full height convex ground blades.
