STEEL / Carbon / Cr / Cobalt / Mn / Moly / Sili / Vanadium
N-685 / 0.90 / 17.5 / 0.00 / 0.40 / 1.10 / 0.45 / 0.10
N-690 / 1.07 / 17.3 / 1.50 / 0.40 / 1.10 / 0.40 / 0.10
N-685 and N-690 are both made Bohler. Bohler is an Austrian company. Their steels are apparently highly refined and expensive.
See:
Bohler - N-685 Some people tend to compare N-685 to 440-B.
And compare N-690 to 440-C.
Some people tend to compare N-690 to VG-10.
I don't know as much about N-685 and how it compares to 440-B, but N-690 does seem to compare more to VG-10 than 440-C to me. VG-10 and N-690 both have cobalt and vanadium. 440-C doesn't.
With the exception of the added cobalt in N-690, N-685 and N-690 are pretty close. But, I am sure the addition of cobalt changes the steel.
Although, ultimately, how a knife performs in use depends on the refinement of the steel and the heat treatment. Bohler is known for highly refined steel and Mike Stewart is known for quality heat treatment.
That said, truthfully, I am not sure I understand why Mike used N-685. N-685 may be very tough for a stainless steel, but Mike has always seemed to pretty strongly believe that no stainless steel is as tough as a good high carbon steel. N-685 is clearly a stainless steel. Still, I am sure Mike took significant care in making the most of N-685 and making it as tough as possible. I believe the additions of Silica, Cobalt and Vanadium all add to toughness.
Some people are always wanting stainless, so he may have just tried to offer the toughest stainless he could find. I don't honestly know if N-685 is the toughest stainless out there, but it is probably high on the list.
----------
Here are some quotes from Mike Stewart about his N-685:
- "forged N685 Bolher Stainless steel -- Triple tempered--Cryo treated--"
--------
- N685 is a very pure -- remelted to remove any impurities -- High Carbon Stainless.
It is very close in formula to 440B but is fine grained like A-2 and 12C27.
It is expensive and not commonly available here in the states.
--------
- "In my chopping tests--it is a very serious performer. I have not chopped any soft woods yet but it flys through hard woods.
I realize this is far less than conventional but we have never been known to be conventional." ..... I don't know if he was referring to steel or blade design when he mentioned "less than conventional"
--------
- "If we wanted to use Stainless on a large--heavy knife--12C27 is out.--Sandvick does not roll it over .187" thick.
If you look at the Forester we are about to come out with--We used Bolher N685 because we can't get the 12C27 in the needed Thickness. The Forester is .275" thick. That fine German steel is more like 440B. More lateral strength than 440C."
---------------------------
Here are some other links to threads discussing N-685 and similar:
Bladeforums - Cliff Stamp comments General Steel Info - .... some light reading....
Bladeforum post ---------------
Ultimately, there isn't a whole lot of info out there about N-685 or even much about N-690 which is much more commonly used.
From what I can tell, they both seem to be quality stainless steels.
I don't personally have the Forrester. It has always been a curious design to me. At one time a few years ago, I had a Boker Smatchete. It was kind of an interesting knife, but I never used it. It never stuck me a a chopper and it always seemed sort of awkward. The Forrester has some significant differences over the Smatchete and the edge seems more suited for chopping than the Smatchete.
I would be interested in hearing your unbiased thoughts and review of the knife.
.