5160 VS. A2 ??
#135535
09/24/07 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 68
SPEICHER
OP
Pooch
|
OP
Pooch
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 68 |
In a 91/2" bowie style blade, which would you folks recommend for overall best performance (keen edge holding ability is a major concern of mine).
Thanks.
Lets Roll
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: SPEICHER]
#135536
09/24/07 03:01 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,607
ZeroNine
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,607 |
JYD #17 I friend will help you move.........
A true friend will help you move a body!"
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: ZeroNine]
#135537
09/24/07 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 401
greens
Mongrel
|
Mongrel
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 401 |
5160 spring steel for that size blade.
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: greens]
#135538
09/24/07 03:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 18,009
Magnum22
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 18,009 |
5160's cheap. i dunno what A2 costs.
JYD #7
Preserve the Yard.
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: Magnum22]
#135539
09/24/07 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,297
Rainwalker
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,297 |
5160, but their both very good if treated right.
JYD#35 Dog Walkin in the Rain
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: Rainwalker]
#135540
09/24/07 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,885
WhichDawg
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,885 |
5160, it's a beast, I beat the heck outta my RD7 (chopping, batoning, zombie quartering) and the edge stayed sharp.
JYD#18 "Server Slayer"
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: WhichDawg]
#135541
09/24/07 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,858
diceman
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,858 |
My Rangers have stayed very sharp, and are extremely easy to sharpen. It stains easily. Thats my only negative comment, even though I don't care about looks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" /> Haven't had any issues w/ pitting, but I'm a stickler for keeping my knives wiped down so they haven't really been exposed to extended neglect (although they're abused when I take them out!)
JYD#9
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: diceman]
#135542
09/24/07 06:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,795
pitman
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,795 |
I would go with A2 if edge holding ability is your main concern but if you are going to be doing a lot of chopping and battoning then I'd go for 5160 !!!
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: pitman]
#135543
09/24/07 06:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,489
Paul the Brit'
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,489 |
SR77, accept no imitations! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
JYD #3 Poor, but still dreaming of a sage and black SOD CG...
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: diceman]
#135544
09/24/07 06:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,943
KnifeGuy
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,943 |
"Generally" for a blade around 9.5" or for any blade intended to be used as a chopper or take similar abuse, I would take 5160. However, it probably comes down to what you intend to do with the knife. If chopping and similar extreme abuse - 5160 If not chopping, I really like A2.
For most blades under 6" and maybe in and around 6" - 6.5" or so, I would most likely prefer A2.
In both cases for A2 & 5160 (and most if not all steels for that matter) the quality of the heat treatment is still very important.
I don't think you can judge steel quality by composition and name alone. Heat treatment is crucial to any given steel performing well.
I am not an expert on Justin/Ranger knives, but Justin is clearly developing and apparently earning a good reputation for his heat-treatments based on the toughness and performance of his knives. That said, I have generally noticed a lower than industry average for Justin's fit and finish.
But, if you want a tough, beater knife at a great price that you can work on and work with, Justin's knives seem pretty hard to beat for the money. - Unless compared to Scrap Yard SR-77.
Swamp Rat would be a step up in price, fit and finish in my book. But, SR-101 (aka 52100) isn't likely any tougher than 5160 - probably comparable - not sure - might be close. ?????
*** If you are looking for tough, SR-77 is tougher than either!!! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbup.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bowdown.gif" alt="" />
In any event, Swamp Rat and Scrap Yard both have a life-time warranty against breakage. So, Toughness is plenty tough enough.
A2 makes an awesome smaller to midsized knife. For edge holding and ease of maintenance, I would take A2 over 5160 in a smaller to mid-sized knife.
SR-101 (52100) from Swamp Rat is a great steel for most sizes. It may not be as tough as SR-77, but it is plenty tough and holds an edge better. But, Sr-77 costs less.
.....then there's INFI. - If you can afford it, INFI is obviously great stuff.
.
JYD #39
I prefer "SATIN" blades!!!
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: pitman]
#135545
09/24/07 07:14 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,743
Leatherface
Junk Yard Dog
|
Junk Yard Dog
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,743 |
I would go with A2 if edge holding ability is your main concern but if you are going to be doing a lot of chopping and battoning then I'd go for 5160 !!! yuppers there we go!! I LOVE to make knives from 5160 and the 2 monster choppers I am currently working on are being ground from 5160 D
|
|
|
Re: 5160 VS. A2 ??
[Re: Leatherface]
#135546
09/24/07 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 68
SPEICHER
OP
Pooch
|
OP
Pooch
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 68 |
Thanks for all the replies...still havnt quite made up my mind, but I have some great options.
Lets Roll
|
|
|
|
|