When chopping, having a sharp edge isnt what cuts, isnt it the brute force of the hack that makes the cut... FOr instance, take one of the Nuclear Ice picks... they are not sharp, but the force behind the stab is what makes it break skin or whatever you are hitting. Am I way off here? Someone set me straight... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/doh.gif" alt="" />
You are definitely WAY "off". - Sorry. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/doh.gif" alt="" />
You need to take same sized blades with same mass and go chop some similar wood. Try some clean (no knot) 2"x4"'s for consistancy. Use one with a Very sharp and well profiled blade vs. an obtuse dull blade.
Sharp and properly profiled blades is JUST as important in chopping as in slicing with kitchen knives. And JUST as noticable.
With enough "force", you can drive a blunt hammer through flesh. Similarly, with enough force, you can drive the dull back spine through wood when chopping.
I could cut down a tree with a big dull round piece of pipe .... But, a sharp blade (with reasonably toughness and geometry) will ALWAYS be more efficient.
However, the better the edge profile and the sharper the edge, the better ANY knife will cut (or penetrate) through ANY material.
The only problem would be if the edge was so acute that the edge breaks and your tool looses ability to continue performing at optimal level. Or if the steel is just not strong/tough enough to maintain it's edge.
Edge profile / sharpness vs. strength/toughness of steel vs. type of cutting and forces against the blade is a "balancing" act.
Ideally, you want a blade to be as sharp and thin as possible without breaking during use. Reduced drag is better as well.
---------
However, sometimes "optimal" sharpness for cutting and or penetration might not the goal.
Consider that with a Nuclear Ice Pick, it really doesn't take much force to penetrate into flesh - "Because" flesh is soft and easy to penetrate AND because the blade is not very thick. So, if you "can" penetrate a "dull" pick into flesh and your goal is for more damage and not so much concern about "ease" of penetration, the dull might actually have some advantages. Depends on what you are trying to achieve.
A sharp needle can penetrate flesh VERY easily, but does very little damage. A dull Railroad spike would do more damage, but wouldn't penetrate nearly as easily.
If you want to "BUST" up concrete, sometimes a wrecking ball or hammer "can" be more effective. Sometimes not. If there is sufficient reinforcement behind the concrete, your wrecking ball or hammer might not penetrate and you might need something more pointed with sufficient mass and or force behind it to create penetration.
Wrecking balls work well on sides of buildings.
Concrete slabs that have reinforcement of the ground underneath need better penetration - like a jackhammer.
If you want to see the difference sharpness can make on your Nuclear Ice Pick, Buy or borrow a dull "punch" of similar diameter to the shaft of your Nuclear Ice Pick and try hand punching it into a phone-book. Then try a sharp (used for ice / regular) Ice Pick.
Or compare a rock pick to a hammer by pounding into the ground.
.