We just got some new Mythbusters material here. Those guys are pretty funny. I have some friends who have accused them of being poor scientists, which they often are. However, the show isn't called "Sciencebusters". They do have a fairly simple and common-sense approach to a lot of questions (many of which are completely stupid, you have to admit). What they are very VERY good at doing, is making people think. Even if you think they're wrong, you have to invest some thought to define why and how you would do it better. I imagine there are few television shows that actually stimulate viewers analysis skills.

Dont forget 1911s and HK, and Sig either.

The only 1911 that I have is a Springfield GI, and it WILL NOT feed HP ammo. At all. Not even if you tap the back of the slide.

Shouldnt matter to you if you can only use ball ammo though.

Anybody a pocket knife historian? I got my hands on an old folder that I'm thinking about cleaning up. It is a pocket folder, with two blades. One is a thin, wide spear-point type blade, very similar to your standard issue SAK. The other blade has a flat, blunt end meant to be used as a screwdriver, and the sharpened edge is straight and does not go all the way to the point. The second blade locks, the first does not. On the base of the knife blade is stamped "Camillus", which I've heard of. The scales are black plastic. The blade metal appears to be stainless (not rusted to any great degree), and the chassis is brass. There is a large integral pivoting lanyard loop.