I wouldn't hesitate a second on a Gen three 9mm or 45. Just on the 40. I would reasearch a Gen 4 9mm before dropping the cash.

I have been spending a healthy amount of time at our range teaching and with all the changes to our pistols out of the 60 students I have had this month the only malfunctions I have seen were ammunition related.

The thing is agencys get the fixes before the general market is taken care of. Free guinea pigs and a way to research issues in the field and under a divers amount of trained shooters with iinstructors to decide if it was human error, ammo or the gun itself. We run about 500 of the same model and a handfull of 23's and 27's.

When you are having 40 or 50 go down with the same problem or 400 of them with bad triggers its an issue.

Will do. We can have a competition if your gun doesn't suck <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Yeah that's a big step up

Yeah I am crossing my fingers

The odds are in your favor GD.

That's what I am hoping but you guys are doing a good job of freaking me out!

I hope to run plenty of ammo throught to check all functions

I got some stuff to use so I hope to shoot it in the next few days.

Echo

Don't freak out. I bet my life on a Gen 4 G-22 everyday. I am confident it will do what i need it to do when it needs to do it. The reason is every time they change something I put about 500 rounds through it.

ANother thing to rember with the lemons i have seen I was never issued on in either the gen 3 or 4. The only malfunction I have ever had was a bad magazine. So don't freak out but verify that the pistol works. And 500 rounds of ammo is some good training if you put it to good use. 175 bucks worth of training and piece of mind.

Y'all cleared out?

500 is the plan