Bruce, so you would say 5200 and 5160 aren't alike? (more from a users standpoint)
because I think you would know more than me.
and... I don't see anything in that post... I guess you could call them "facts" it just doesn't tell me much.
Its 52100 not 5200.
And those are the facts of it, each element in the steel and the % of it in it adds to the steels properties.
I have never used sr-101 or 52100 but eather have you.
Looking at it from a metallurgical standpoint 5160 and 52100 are very different.
yeah, sorry.
from a metallurgical point, they are different.
I WAS under the impression from a users standpoint they had some similar properties??? (maybe thats not the right word) or "behaved" alike.
and I don't know why I kept tping 5200 or 52000 or w/e.
sorry.
and No I have not used any sr101.
I was just wondering if you had and new something I didn't.
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
recon: I think coldone mentioned something from another thread???
if you did "badmouth" (not saying you did, but obviously something "happened") a company or somehting in another thread
that may have lead him to believe you meant to or were badmouthing spyderco.
but I think i did understand where you were coming from.
but since all he gave was a warning,you could've just explained yourself/re-worded your post.
maybe next time that'd be a better idea.
(just trying to help BTW <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />)
