In my own testing, I found the ratweiler to be a better chopper than any I own in that size (7"-8") blade, including the Yard Guard. I find the micarta handle surprisingly comfortable for my big paws. It's a heavy knife (heavier than the DFLE) but it's compact size makes it handy for carry.
Vic,
I agree that I think the Chopweiler is about as nice a mid-sized 7" - 8" bladed "Chopper" I have come across.
I mentioned this about the Chopweiler on Swamp Rat Chat forum.
I don't think the Chopweiler is quite as versatile as the Camp Tramp. The Camp Tramp is still one of my favorite Camp knives. The Camp Tramp is lighter and more nimble. It is just going to do some things a little better and probably have just a little broader range of uses with it's lighter feel.
On the other hand, the Chopweiler is more of a Brute, probably a little better "Chopper" and is just more "Awesome" to behold.
The concept Scrap-Weiler would most likely be more like a slightly larger Camp Tramp with (IMO <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />) a better blade shape than the Camp Tramp. I personally think the slightly less radiused belly (flatter belly) and pointier tip of the Scrap-Weiler concept offers some field use and camp use advantages over the steeply radiused Camp Tramp. How the Scrap-Weiler concept would handle would have a lot to do with what Dan does with the blade - How thick and what kind of primary grind - partial grind or full height grind.
Of course, this is all assuming that we would be so lucky to get a Scrap-Weiler similar to the concept. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bowdown.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bowdown.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crossfingers.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crossfingers.gif" alt="" />
The Scrap-Weiler concept would feel significantly different from the Chopweiler because of the difference in weight in the handle.
IF:
Yard Guard..............= 7.25” blade; 0.270" thick (Stripped and satin finished); 16.0 ounces
Camp Tramp............= 7.325" blade; 0.236" thick (stripped); 14.5 ounces
Chopweiler - Micarta = 7.5625” blade; 0.239” thick (with coating); 19.1 ounces
And assuming the Scrap-Weiler concept has about an 8" blade, I would hope for the blade to be of thickness and grind that the over-all weight stays pretty close to 15 - 15.5 ounces or so.
Again, I am not sure how I would choose:
0.277" thick with Full Height grind (Or similar)
Vs.
0.24" thick with 5/7ths height grind (Or similar)
???????????????????????????????????????????????????
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
But, the blade weight and thickness of the Chopweiler is VERY fine with me. The typical weight reduction from full tang micarta to Res-C in similar sized blades is about 4 - 4.5 ounces or so. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbup.gif" alt="" />
-----
For a full tang micarta chopper handle, I think the Chopweiler's handle is going to be VERY hard to improve upon with (vs. other full tang micarta options) (IMO). It feels very good in my hands as a heavy duty chopper as well. (I also have pretty large hands. I wear XL gloves, but I wouldn't call my hands either thick or thin.)
But, the Res-C always feels good as well and Res-C is always going to be lighter and have some advantages for carry (IMO) to any comparable sized full tange micarta handled knife. I think the lighter handled Res-C version of a Scrap-Weiler type concept would actually be (like the Camp Tramp, but better) in that it would be more nimble and versatile with a little broader range of use than even the amazing Chopweiler.
The Chopweiler might still have a very slight small percentage advantage in chopping - just simply due to the heavier weight being able to drive more force into chopping blows.
But, there are other advantages to a lighter over-all knife, slightly faster blade speed and more nimble, etc.
Kind of like comparing a DFCG to a DFLE (?????).
I don't know that one would be "better" than the other. They would just be a little different. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbup.gif" alt="" />
**** That is why I want both!!!! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbup.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbup.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crossfingers.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crossfingers.gif" alt="" />
.