Here is the link to the abstract of one of the studies. This is from Norway and the animal is moose. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22651819

Greaser, I think the main part of the bill is about lead that goes into the environment. Take steel shot for duck hunting.

here's another http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19390698

This is the link to the bill http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0701-0750/ab_711_cfa_20130515_172939_asm_floor.html

What do you guys think?

Yeah but that little lead from hunting every year don't do jack

It sounds like it only builds to dangerous levels when you are constantly exposed to high levels. A study cited on Wikipedia states that most hunters have lower lead levels in their blood than most US citizens.

But back to the armor piercing I bet you could make a case for it because copper is going to be harder than lead meaning that if it did not expand properly it could then defeat armor.

Yea, I'll have to check on that angle.

Because who knows what is in our farmed meat..?

Game is probably a lot healthier in most respects.

Less chemicals

And tastier! Not sure how wild bacon tastes.

Congratulations, you've just given me a mission

Lets be clear on any proposed legislation concerning lead bullet bans.
This is no different than any other 2A attack. They don't want us to own guns and they don't want us to hunt at all!
There is no creditable evidence concerning raised levels of lead due to bullet production. If we give these clowns an inch they'll take a yard.
Trying to make your arguments without researching the facts will get you in trouble quickly.