When Saul or Cyrus or Alexander or Caesar wanted military slingers, they started by recruiting shepherds.
You make an interesting point, and it seems plausible. Though I might point out that when deployed en masse, accuracy is (within sensible boundaries) less important than speed. You didn't need to train a slinger to be able to kill a running wolf if he's got a standing division for a target. I mean, if you've got a thousand soldiers all slinging at a block of another thousand soldiers, an error of plus or minus a couple of feet at range just means you hit the guy's buddies. Same with early musketry. Get enough soldiers together all shooting in the same direction at the same time, and they don't need to be crack shots;
somebody's going to hit
something through sheer saturation.
You could make the same argument about the Welsh/English longbow. “Quantity has a quality of its own.” If it were that simple, why didn’t France field longbow men after Crecy and Agincourt?
Because they couldn’t. When you look at something like the English longbow men, you have to think in terms of weapons systems. The technology of the Welsh reflex-deflex longbow is relatively simple. It requires craftsmanship to make bow and arrow, but it’s low technology craftsmanship. No Bessemer furnaces or computers required. Using the longbow in war is a different story.
The English knew that it took a lifetime to train a good bowman. Children learned to hold a bow stave at arm’s length for an hour at a time, and that was just the beginning. English squires and their men at arms were required by law to practice archery every day. Was it one of the Edwards who forbade the game of golf because walking the links was cutting into archery practice time? I’m not sure, but one of the English kings did.
Even employed en masse, the bowman had to be strong, and fast, and accurate, all three and all at once. Teaching someone to having multiple arrows in the air, all of them shot at full draw, all of them carefully aimed, is not something you can impart to raw recruits in a month. That combination of speed and power and accuracy is what made the longbow superior to the (relatively) easy-to-learn crossbow. At Crecy the Genovese crossbowmen got off a shot once or twice every two minutes. The English longbow men launched an arrow every five seconds.
(In the confusion of battle, the fixed shields, called pavises, which protected the crossbowmen while they reloaded, were left in the baggage train. The Genovese, exhausted from a long march in armor, and exposed to English archery without their accustomed shields, took heavy losses and then fell back. The French knights called them cowards and attacked them, killing many. This can’t have been good for group-unit-cohesion.)
I would argue that slingers were similar to longbow men. I never practiced enough to get good with a sling. But in my experience, just getting the rock to fly in the general direction you want to aim at is an accomplishment. (I remember some contestants gathering pebbles for an SCA sling contest. One of us muttered, “We need more mass.” I said, “Let’s keep religion out of this.”)
It won’t do much for group-unit-cohesion if a slinger accidentally kills a soldier on his own side. Such an accident is easily possible for a beginner slinger. You’re not going to pick up a sling and learn to use it for military purposes in five easy lessons. Being able to launch stones or lead bullets fast and repeatedly, hitting targets at a great distance, is no easy task even without requiring great accuracy. You are way better off recruiting people who already have the skill.
Thanks for the link, Andy. It saved me having to look up specific examples. I’m pulling these quotes from
A Formidable Ancient Weapon by Rean Steenkamp.
Although David is the best-known sling user in the Bible, he is not the only one. In Judges 20:16 we read that 700 specially chosen men from the clan of Benjamin could all sling accurately “to the width of a hair", something many infantrymen today cannot do with a modern rifle.
According to Livy, the Roman historian, the Aegean slingers were the best. They could not only hit an enemy in the face at will, but on any particular part of the face!
The famed Balearic slingers apparently owed their ability to dedicated practice from a very early age. According to the historian Diodorus, mothers in the Balearic islands would place a piece of bread on top of a pole, and the young slinger was not allowed to eat it until he has knocked it off with his sling.
Sounds like training young archers to me. The beginning of a life-long effort.