i just cant get over that "tough" guy on the website.at least he's the founder/owner of the company and not a model they payed to look tough.he is over doing it a bit though.

miltner-adams was at the blade show last year.i didnt go to their booth though.i have no idea if their knives are any good.i know i dont like the design of their fixed blade.

as far as diamondblades is concerned i dont doubt for a second they are great knives and i'm not calling them weak but imo they shouldnt even be mentioned in a conversation of toughest knives in history.

and when i say tough i mean in general.i dont care what the exact websters term is.you guys no what i mean.i mean FFFBM tough.i mean .320 ASH-1 tough.i mean .285 dumpstermutt tough.there is no way a knife with a spine thickness of 0.118-0.120 can really compete in toughness.will it out cut them??...yes,but we are talking tough.as in bad [censored],hardcore,strong.

lets just give one of these diamondblades to noss and see how long it takes him to break it.i bet it breaks sooner than any knife he has tested yet.