This is not a political question. It is a LEGAL question. In a recent trial, much of the media reported that the defendant “crossed state lines with an AR-15”. This statement was actually incorrect, the firearm was already in the state. My question is why was so much emphasis placed on “crossing state lines” as if doing so was against the law?
I thought it might have been something to do with him coming from komminoise
If you’re not Paranoid, You’re not paying attention Be a Sheepdog JYD#105
