For me, and right now, I consider a folder as a just a slicer (after abusing too many of them). I really don't see the point of having an extreme thick stock on a folder, but a nice long blade is definitely nice. With a folder, I can get a much longer edge than on a small fix blade. Plus, I don't need a sheath with a folder.

Let me take the Rukus as an example when compared to an AD. The Rukus has a much longer blade than a AD, .75 in longer. The cutting edge of the Rukus is probably even longer due to Busse's oversized choil. From what I see, the Rukus cutting length is at least an inch longer than the AD's. The Rukus folded is also almost two inches shorter than an AD when folded.

Which would I use more frequently?

The Rukus. It would definitely make a better cutter than an AD. It's also easier to carry, has a longer more utilitarian blade and I don't need a sheath. Of course the AD is much stronger than a Rukus, but if I needed to destroy something, I'd probably reach for my FBM. EDCing a folder is much more practical than EDCing a small fixed blade with a blade length of 3.5" or shorter. I mean, unless your fine carrying a RMD work, by all means do it.

Also, the Rukus, as long as it is folded fits in my pocket fine. In fact, the high clip really just makes the knife disappear in my pocket until I need it. I can even carry inside my the waist of my pants comfortably. In fact, when it's on my waist, it feels so natural because of how low it rides.

That's just me.

Also, for me, overbuilt folding knives are just too dang cool....... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />